REGLAS DEL METODO SOCIOLOGICO, LAS by DURKHEIM, E. and a great selection of similar Used, New and Collectible Books available now at. Buy Las Reglas del Metodo Sociologico (Universitaria) by Emile Durkheim (ISBN : ) from Amazon’s Book Store. Everyday low prices and free. emile durkheim las reglas del método sociológico fondo de cultura económica méxico emile durkheim las reglas del método sociológico fondo de cultura.
|Published (Last):||27 April 2008|
|PDF File Size:||7.25 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.40 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Mike rated it liked it Feb 27, Open Preview See a Problem?
Las Reglas del Método Sociológico by Émile Durkheim (3 star ratings)
To see what your friends thought of this book, please sign up. Jennifer rated it liked it Jan 17, Sep 29, Dukheim rated it liked it. Return to Book Page. In his view, social science should be purely holistic; that is, sociology should study phenomena attributed to society at large, rather than being limited to the specific actions of individuals.
Inhe published his Rules of the Sociological Method and set up Much of Durkheim’s work was concerned with how societies could maintain their integrity and coherence in modernity; an era in which traditional social and religious ties are no longer assumed, and in which new social institutions have come into being.
These rules are for the most part reasonably justified, from his conception of social facts as phenomena external to the individual, to the proper means of observing them one must always try to discard any preconceptionsto the proper means of explaning them, to demonstrating an explanation through further proofs. He remained a dominant force in French intellectual life until his death inpresenting numerous lectures and published works on a variety of topics, including the sociology of knowledge, morality, social stratification, religion, law, education, and deviance.
Marxism assimilates preexisting ideas and calls them its own, it rests on inadequate proofs and unproven hypotheses, and it contradicts both itself and scientifically-established factsand to elaborate on a few points of the book that may have generated confusion.
Hester rated it liked it May 18, It is a dry text I’ve attempted to capture it’s tone in my reviewbut it is not without its merits. Emy Aron rated it liked it Reglws 09, I don’t djrkheim know how I manage to finish this book aside the fact that it is a mandatory reading for the classical theory class in Sociology. Hosein Ahmadi rated it liked it Dec 13, Goodreads helps socuologico keep track of books you want to read.
Durkheim’s seminal monograph, Suicidea study of suicide rates amongst Catholic and Protestant populations, pioneered modern social research and served to distinguish social science from psychology and political philosophy.
Muhammad Shemyal Nisar rated it liked it May 11, Want to Read Currently Reading Read. Durkheim was also deeply preoccupied with the acceptance of sociology as a legitimate science.
His first major sociological work was The Division of Labor in Society Lists with This Book.
Sections on determining the cause of a social fact in previously existing social facts and not in personal psychological sources ring true among those of us frustrated by current social explanations given in internal or individualistic terms: To those who, like me, abhor academic ignorance and believe in the importance of a set scientific paradigm, this is essential reading. Alex Noya rated it liked it Dec 23, Thanks for telling us about the problem.
A seminal work in sociology or more broadly, as Durkheim would prefer, in social sciencethis book details what a scientific approach to the study of societies ought to look like.
Matvey Menetrey rated it liked it Feb 03, Included in this edition are fifteen additional essays, articles, notes, and letters written by and about the author to further expound on his method and philosophy. Not necessarily radical, but Durkheim’s durkeim against Descartes is really interesting and lively, and spot-on.
Las Reglas del Método Sociológico
Non ho trovato il titolo in italiano, tradotto “Le regole del metodo sociologico”. Jessy rated it liked it Sep 04, Want to Read saving…. We are reglaa of our society, and not the other way around.
Trivia About Rules of Sociolog Quotes from Rules of Sociolog For him, sociology was the science of institutions, its aim being to discover structural social facts.
The Elementary Forms of Religious Lifepresented a theory of religion, comparing the social and cultural lives of aboriginal and modern societies. Livro pra faculdade, portanto estudei e li com calma e profundidade. No trivia or quizzes yet. Much of Durkheim’s work was concerned with how societies could maintain their integrity and coherence in modernity; an era in which traditional social and religious ties are no longer assumed, and in which new social soxiologico have come into being. These do well to explain sociology’s place in relation to other social sciences and disciplines, durkhfim Durkheim’s vision of a positivist sociology differs from that of the Marxists among his many criticisms: Sergio Villa rated it liked it Jun 21, Durkheimian terms such as “collective consciousness” have since entered the popular lexicon.
Many of the rules the author sets out appear self-evident, even though a myriad of social scientists, students, and amateur thinkers today teglas fail to abide by them. These rules are for ls most part reasonably justified, from his conception of social facts as reeglas external to the individual, to the proper mea A seminal work in sociology or more broadly, as Durkheim would vurkheim, in social sciencethis book details what a scientific approach to the study of societies ought to look like.
Beth Dougherty rated it liked it Dec 23, Durkheim was a major proponent of structural functionalism, a foundational perspective in both sociology and anthropology. Two chapters in this volume on distinguishing between “normal” and “pathological” societies and on identifying social types–to which the author ascribes the moniker “social morphology”–are interesting but largely dismissable in today’s academic environment as metkdo reflect a very 19th-Century image of progress in social evolution; while Durkheim doesn’t strictly adhere to the contemporary ethnocentric progression of “savage” to “barbarian” to “civilized man”, he does approximate it with assumptions about “lower peoples” who are “less developed” and sociologgico distinguishing of societies into genera and species based on “given phase[s] of development”, etc.
Yet it is in these chapters that we find one of the most controversial and thought-provoking examples in this book: